So runs one of the arguments presented by the Californians who want to reinstitute a discriminatory marriage scheme in that state. From the petitioner's brief in Hollingsworth v. Perry:
As even Plaintiffs’ lead counsel was forced to acknowledge below, “heterosexual couples who practice sexual be- havior outside their marriage” present “a big threat to irresponsible procreation,” but same-sex couples “don’t present a threat of irresponsible procreation.” J.A.933-34. Under Johnson and Cleburne, that is the end of the matter.In other words, we need to keep discriminatory straight-only marriage because otherwise horny straight people will have kids out of wedlock.
The sanctity of marriage, folks.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder